A bitter High Court dispute has damaged out among prospective neighbours about the development of a wall in a coastal website inside of a north Dublin suburb, a case that has attracted nationwide attention subsequent an Irish Periods report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres with a proposed household dwelling at Sutton Strand, where allegations of arranging breaches, environmental problems, and long-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled in to the courts. The Irish Moments article about René Collier and also the Irish Periods report about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what began as a local disagreement has evolved right into a really publicised lawful struggle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing above building operates at the location on Dublin Street, Sutton, the place Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a physician and a business director respectively, seek out to construct their loved ones house. The situation happens to be emblematic of broader disputes along Eire’s coastline, wherever growth pressures collide with environmental protections along with the sensitivities of set up residents. In accordance with the Irish Times report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall getting created by their potential neighbours goes over and above the boundaries permitted beneath arranging permission.
René Collier and Paul Feely, equally residents of Dublin Highway, claim that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the conditions of their setting up permission by creating a wall beyond the boundaries of their site, resulting in an encroachment with a Special Place of Conservation. The SAC designation is central on the dispute, as such regions are subject to rigid controls less than European and Irish environmental legislation. Within their courtroom filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even insignificant encroachments could have Long lasting ecological implications, significantly in the delicate coastal atmosphere for example Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny they are in breach of their organizing authorization, and say the wall, which happens to be partly constructed, is in the right placement. Their lawful workforce has characterised the motion being an make an effort to hold off or frustrate a lawful improvement. The couple accuse litigants of in search of to halt homebuilding so that you can maintain their view, an allegation that has been repeated in court docket and referenced in protection of the situation. This accusation goes to the center of numerous coastal arranging disputes, where by sights of The ocean are equally remarkably prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Periods report naming René Collier and Paul Feely explained remarkable attempts through the plaintiffs to document the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded through ocean in storm to photograph the site, according to sworn proof referenced from the Irish Periods. In one account, Rene Collier waded by means of waist-high h2o through a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Instances, an image which includes considering the fact that come to be emblematic with the depth from the dispute. These steps were not basically symbolic; they ended up intended to gather Visible evidence of your wall’s situation relative to tidal lines and guarded land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the website from the sea Irish Periods described, describing how the two Adult men entered the water all through extreme climatic conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading by means of storm water to photograph the positioning became One of the more hanging descriptions to arise from court reporting. The Irish Moments post about accountant Paul Feely observed that this kind of actions ended up cited to demonstrate the plaintiffs’ belief the wall prolonged into an area influenced by tidal motion, strengthening their argument which the SAC was becoming encroached upon.
The situations at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 had been included intimately from the nationwide push. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Periods 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Times January 27 2026 became broadly searched phrases as viewers sought to understand the track record and implications of the case. On that date, the High Court heard more submissions on whether interim orders ought to be granted to halt building pending a full hearing. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a key instant during the legal timeline.
At the core from the dispute is really a disagreement more than boundaries, preparing compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely preserve that the wall, as created, goes over and above what was accepted and intrudes into guarded land. They argue that this is not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by job, has actually been referred to as meticulous in his examination of planning files, maps, and problems attached to the authorization.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have the two pressured that their motion is motivated by issue for environmental safety and adherence to planning legislation. They reject claims that the case is about preserving A personal look at, insisting as an alternative that it is about guaranteeing that improvement at Sutton Strand respects lawful and ecological limitations. In affidavits, they have described their long-standing link to the area as well as their recognition of its environmental sensitivity.
On another facet, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed on their own as a pair just attempting to produce a loved ones dwelling in accordance Along with the law. They deny the wall encroaches with a Specific Space of Conservation and say that all will work happen to be completed dependant on Skilled information and authorized strategies. Their legal professionals have argued which the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and that the dramatic actions of René Collier and Paul Feely, which includes coming into the sea through a storm, never alter the fundamental information.
The case has also elevated broader questions on how scheduling disputes are resolved in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court dispute more than construction of wall at coastal website is becoming a shorthand description for your scenario that lots of observers see as progressively widespread. As sea stages rise and coastal erosion intensifies, the precise delineation between non-public land, community foreshore, and protected habitats is starting to become much more contentious.
The Irish Occasions posting about René Collier observed the businessman had previously been linked to area advocacy on setting up and environmental difficulties, however not at this scale. Meanwhile, the Irish Situations report about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how men and women from really distinct Expert backgrounds can discover themselves aligned in these types of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some studies spell their names, have grown to be synonymous with the Sutton Strand scenario.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the website within the sea Irish Moments coverage emphasised, underlining The bizarre lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded by Paul Feely accountant way of midsection-large h2o in the course of a storm to photograph the internet site Irish Instances and René Collier waded by waist-substantial h2o throughout a storm to photograph the internet site Irish Times are phrases that appeared continuously in protection, reflecting both of those the physical reality on the coastline plus the symbolic mother nature of the act. For supporters in the plaintiffs, these actions demonstrated dedication; for critics, they illustrated the things they see as an extreme technique.
As being the High Court proceedings go on, the result continues to be unsure. The court docket will have to determine whether or not the wall as built complies with planning authorization and whether or not any encroachment into a Special Area of Conservation has happened. The lawful arguments are complex, involving interpretation of maps, tidal data, and planning conditions. Yet the human element continues to be central: neighbours who ought to Stay along with each other extensive following the authorized fees happen to be compensated.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing around development operates at the site on Dublin Highway, Sutton, although the implications of the case extend further than that deal with. For planners, builders, and inhabitants alike, the dispute serves as being a reminder of the necessity of clarity in arranging permissions and sensitivity in coastal development. In addition it underscores how speedily an area disagreement can escalate when elementary problems which include environmental safety and assets rights are perceived to generally be at stake.
In the meantime, Sutton Strand continues to be a spot of pure elegance and contested boundaries. The wall for the centre from the dispute stands partially crafted, a physical manifestation of unresolved authorized questions. No matter whether it'll eventually be altered, eradicated, or finished as planned will depend upon the courtroom’s conclusions. Until then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variations will very likely continue on to look in headlines, linked indelibly to Just about the most carefully viewed scheduling disputes in north Dublin recently.