A bitter High Court dispute has broken out amongst prospective neighbours around the construction of a wall in a coastal site inside of a north Dublin suburb, a case that has attracted nationwide attention adhering to an Irish Periods report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres with a proposed household dwelling at Sutton Strand, exactly where allegations of arranging breaches, environmental fears, and long-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled in to the courts. The Irish Instances report about René Collier as well as Irish Times post about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what commenced as a local disagreement has progressed right into a really publicised lawful fight.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing about development will work at the internet site on Dublin Highway, Sutton, where by Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a health care provider and a firm director respectively, search for to create their household property. The case has become emblematic of broader disputes alongside Ireland’s coastline, where enhancement pressures collide with environmental protections as well as sensitivities of recognized citizens. According to the Irish Situations report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall currently being made by their prospective neighbours goes outside of the boundaries permitted beneath planning authorization.
René Collier and Paul Feely, each people of Dublin Road, assert that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the terms in their preparing authorization by building a wall outside of the boundaries in their internet site, leading to an encroachment on the Special Place of Conservation. The SAC designation is central for the dispute, therefore locations are issue to stringent controls less than European and Irish environmental law. Within their court filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even minimal encroachments might have lasting ecological penalties, specifically inside of a sensitive coastal setting which include Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They may be in breach of their setting up authorization, and say the wall, that is partially created, is in the right posture. Their lawful team has characterised the action as an attempt to delay or frustrate a lawful advancement. The few accuse litigants of trying to find to halt homebuilding in order to preserve their see, an allegation that has been repeated in court and referenced in protection of the situation. This accusation goes to the guts of numerous coastal planning disputes, wherever views of The ocean are both equally highly prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Occasions report naming René Collier and Paul Feely described remarkable initiatives because of the plaintiffs to doc the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded by way of ocean in storm to photograph the positioning, Based on sworn proof referenced from the Irish Periods. In one account, Rene Collier waded via midsection-significant drinking water in the course of a storm to photograph the website Irish Times, a picture that has because come to be emblematic with the intensity of your dispute. These actions weren't simply symbolic; they were meant to Collect Visible evidence on the wall’s place relative to tidal strains and protected land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the internet site from your sea Irish Times described, describing how The 2 Gentlemen entered the h2o for the duration of serious weather conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading through storm drinking water to photograph the internet site became One of the more hanging descriptions to arise from court docket reporting. The Irish Occasions report about accountant Paul Feely noted that this sort of steps were being cited to show the plaintiffs’ belief the wall prolonged into a region affected by tidal movement, strengthening their argument that the SAC was currently being encroached on.
The situations at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 had been lined in detail because of the countrywide push. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Occasions 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Instances January 27 2026 grew to become broadly searched phrases as viewers sought to be familiar with the background and implications of the case. On that day, the High Court read further more submissions on regardless of whether interim orders needs to be granted to halt building pending a complete hearing. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a important moment within the legal timeline.
At the Main of your dispute can be a disagreement in excess of boundaries, organizing compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely sustain that the wall, as constructed, goes beyond what was authorised and intrudes into secured land. They argue that this is simply not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by occupation, continues to be called meticulous in his evaluation of organizing files, maps, and ailments connected towards the authorization.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have the two pressured that their action is motivated by worry for environmental protection and adherence to scheduling legislation. They reject promises that the case is about preserving A personal check out, insisting rather that it's about ensuring that progress at Sutton Strand respects legal and ecological boundaries. In affidavits, they've explained their long-standing link to the region and their consciousness of its environmental sensitivity.
On one other side, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed by themselves as a pair just endeavoring to develop a spouse and children residence in accordance While using the law. They deny the wall encroaches over a Distinctive Region of Conservation and say that each one is effective happen to be completed based upon professional suggestions and accredited designs. Their lawyers have argued that the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and that the extraordinary steps of René Collier and Paul Feely, including entering the sea throughout a storm, usually do not change the underlying details.
The case has also raised broader questions on how planning disputes are fixed in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court docket dispute around design of wall at coastal web page happens to be a shorthand description for just a problem that numerous observers see as significantly popular. As sea concentrations increase and coastal erosion intensifies, the precise delineation in between non-public Paul Feely land, community foreshore, and protected habitats is becoming more contentious.
The Irish Situations short article about René Collier famous that the businessman experienced Earlier been involved with area advocacy on planning and environmental problems, though not at this scale. In the meantime, the Irish Situations article about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how individuals from very different professional backgrounds can discover them selves aligned in these disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some stories spell their names, became synonymous Along with the Sutton Strand situation.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the website in the sea Irish Times protection emphasised, underlining the unusual lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded through midsection-substantial water during a storm to photograph the internet site Irish Moments and René Collier waded via midsection-substantial water all through a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Occasions are phrases that appeared consistently in coverage, reflecting both equally the physical fact from the coastline as well as symbolic character of your act. For supporters in the plaintiffs, these steps demonstrated dedication; for critics, they illustrated whatever they see as an extreme solution.
Since the High Court proceedings go on, the outcome stays unsure. The court docket should ascertain whether or not the wall as developed complies with setting up authorization and regardless of whether any encroachment right into a Exclusive Area of Conservation has occurred. The authorized arguments are advanced, involving interpretation of maps, tidal data, and preparing problems. Nonetheless the human element remains central: neighbours who should Dwell along with one another very long once the lawful prices have been paid.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing over construction works at the website on Dublin Road, Sutton, however the implications of the situation increase further than that handle. For planners, builders, and citizens alike, the dispute serves like a reminder of the significance of clarity in preparing permissions and sensitivity in coastal advancement. Additionally, it underscores how rapidly a local disagreement can escalate when essential difficulties for example environmental safety and property legal rights are perceived to get at stake.
In the meantime, Sutton Strand continues to be a spot of natural natural beauty and contested boundaries. The wall with the centre from the dispute stands partly developed, a Actual physical manifestation of unresolved authorized concerns. Whether it can in the end be altered, eradicated, or accomplished as prepared will rely on the court docket’s findings. Until eventually then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variations will probable carry on to seem in headlines, joined indelibly to The most intently viewed organizing disputes in north Dublin recently.