A bitter High Court dispute has broken out between possible neighbours above the development of the wall in a coastal web site inside of a north Dublin suburb, a case which has captivated countrywide interest adhering to an Irish Situations report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres on the proposed spouse and children house at Sutton Strand, wherever allegations of preparing breaches, environmental worries, and very long-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled in to the courts. The Irish Moments posting about René Collier and also the Irish Moments posting about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what began as a local disagreement has developed into a very publicised authorized fight.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing about construction operates at the internet site on Dublin Road, Sutton, exactly where Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a doctor and an organization director respectively, look for to construct their loved ones property. The case is becoming emblematic of wider disputes together Eire’s coastline, the place growth pressures collide with environmental protections plus the sensitivities of proven citizens. According to the Irish Occasions report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall becoming built by their future neighbours goes outside of the boundaries permitted beneath preparing authorization.
René Collier and Paul Feely, both equally inhabitants of Dublin Road, assert that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the terms in their organizing permission by building a wall past the boundaries of their web-site, bringing about an encroachment with a Special Area of Conservation. The SAC designation is central for the dispute, therefore areas are topic to rigorous controls beneath European and Irish environmental regulation. Within their court docket filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even minor encroachments could have lasting ecological effects, especially within a delicate coastal atmosphere for example Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny they are in breach of their arranging authorization, and say the wall, which is partially built, is in the correct placement. Their authorized workforce has characterised the motion being an make an effort to hold off or frustrate a lawful improvement. The couple accuse litigants of trying to find to halt homebuilding so that you can maintain their view, an allegation that has been repeated in court and referenced in protection of the situation. This accusation goes to the guts of numerous coastal setting up disputes, wherever sights of the sea are equally hugely prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Periods report naming René Collier and Paul Feely explained remarkable attempts from the plaintiffs to document the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded through ocean in storm to photograph the site, according to sworn evidence referenced in the Irish Times. In a single account, Rene Collier waded by way of waistline-higher h2o during a storm to photograph the internet site Irish Periods, an image which includes due to the fact turn into emblematic in the depth with the dispute. These actions weren't simply symbolic; they were being intended to Assemble visual proof on the wall’s place relative to tidal strains and protected land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the internet site with the sea Irish Times described, describing how the two men entered the drinking water throughout intense climatic conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading by way of storm h2o to photograph the website turned Just about the most hanging descriptions to emerge from court docket reporting. The Irish Occasions short article about accountant Paul Feely noted that these kinds of steps were cited to exhibit the plaintiffs’ perception which the wall prolonged into an area impacted by tidal movement, strengthening their argument the SAC was remaining encroached on.
The occasions at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 have been protected intimately with the countrywide push. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Moments 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Times January 27 2026 grew to become broadly searched phrases as readers sought to comprehend the qualifications and implications of the situation. On that day, the High Court read further submissions on whether or not interim orders ought to be granted to halt design pending an entire Listening to. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a essential minute inside the legal timeline.
For the Main of your dispute is a disagreement over boundaries, planning compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely maintain which the wall, as produced, goes outside of what was permitted and intrudes into safeguarded land. They argue that this isn't a Irish Times report naming René Collier and Paul Feely trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by job, is referred to as meticulous in his examination of preparing paperwork, maps, and disorders connected towards the authorization.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have equally stressed that their motion is motivated by issue for environmental safety and adherence to organizing regulation. They reject statements that the situation is about preserving A non-public view, insisting in its place that it is about making sure that advancement at Sutton Strand respects lawful and ecological limitations. In affidavits, they may have described their extensive-standing connection to the world as well as their awareness of its environmental sensitivity.
On the opposite facet, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed on their own as a few simply seeking to create a spouse and children residence in accordance While using the law. They deny the wall encroaches over a Distinctive Region of Conservation and say that each one works have already been performed based on Specialist assistance and accredited designs. Their legal professionals have argued which the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and which the dramatic steps of René Collier and Paul Feely, such as getting into the sea in the course of a storm, usually do not change the underlying information.
The case has also raised broader questions on how preparing disputes are resolved in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court dispute over construction of wall at coastal site has become a shorthand description for a situation that many observers see as increasingly common. As sea levels increase and coastal erosion intensifies, the exact delineation among private land, general public foreshore, and protected habitats is becoming additional contentious.
The Irish Situations article about René Collier pointed out the businessman had Earlier been associated with regional advocacy on organizing and environmental issues, nevertheless not at this scale. Meanwhile, the Irish Times short article about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how individuals from pretty diverse Expert backgrounds can discover themselves aligned in these types of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some studies spell their names, are getting to be synonymous Along with the Sutton Strand case.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the location in the sea Irish Periods coverage emphasised, underlining The bizarre lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded as a result of waist-significant h2o in the course of a storm to photograph the internet site Irish Instances and René Collier waded by midsection-higher drinking water all through a storm to photograph the website Irish Instances are phrases that appeared regularly in protection, reflecting each the Bodily fact with the coastline and the symbolic nature from the act. For supporters on the plaintiffs, these actions demonstrated motivation; for critics, they illustrated what they see as an abnormal approach.
Because the High Court proceedings proceed, the end result stays uncertain. The court must figure out whether the wall as constructed complies with preparing permission and regardless of whether any encroachment into a Distinctive Space of Conservation has transpired. The authorized arguments are sophisticated, involving interpretation of maps, tidal information, and preparing conditions. Yet the human ingredient continues to be central: neighbours who have to Dwell alongside one another prolonged after the lawful expenditures are already paid.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing around development operates at the site on Dublin Street, Sutton, nevertheless the implications of the situation lengthen beyond that tackle. For planners, developers, and inhabitants alike, the dispute serves as being a reminder of the importance of clarity in setting up permissions and sensitivity in coastal growth. Additionally, it underscores how immediately a neighborhood disagreement can escalate when essential troubles such as environmental safety and assets rights are perceived to generally be at stake.
In the meantime, Sutton Strand continues to be a place of pure attractiveness and contested boundaries. The wall at the centre on the dispute stands partly constructed, a Bodily manifestation of unresolved lawful concerns. No matter if it'll in the long run be altered, removed, or accomplished as prepared will count on the court’s findings. Until eventually then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variants will most likely proceed to look in headlines, joined indelibly to Probably the most intently viewed planning disputes in north Dublin in recent years.