A bitter High Court dispute has damaged out amongst potential neighbours over the construction of a wall in a coastal site within a north Dublin suburb, a scenario which includes attracted national consideration next an Irish Occasions report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres on the proposed family residence at Sutton Strand, wherever allegations of planning breaches, environmental issues, and prolonged-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled in the courts. The Irish Situations article about René Collier and also the Irish Instances report about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what started as a neighborhood disagreement has developed into a very publicised legal battle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing over construction works at the website on Dublin Road, Sutton, where Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a health care provider and a corporation director respectively, request to make their spouse and children household. The situation is becoming emblematic of wider disputes together Ireland’s coastline, exactly where development pressures collide with environmental protections and the sensitivities of founded inhabitants. According to the Irish Occasions report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall being manufactured by their possible neighbours goes past the boundaries permitted under scheduling permission.
René Collier and Paul Feely, each people of Dublin Street, assert that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the phrases of their arranging permission by developing a wall past the boundaries in their internet site, bringing about an encroachment on a Exclusive Location of Conservation. The SAC designation is central into the dispute, as such spots are topic to demanding controls below European and Irish environmental regulation. In their court docket filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even small encroachments might have Long lasting ecological effects, especially in a very sensitive coastal surroundings which include Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They may be in breach of their setting up authorization, and say the wall, which can be partially crafted, is in the correct placement. Their lawful crew has characterised the action being an attempt to delay or frustrate a lawful improvement. The few accuse litigants of in search of to halt homebuilding to be able to preserve their look at, an allegation that's been recurring in courtroom and referenced in coverage of the situation. This accusation goes to the guts of numerous coastal preparing disputes, the place sights of The ocean are both extremely prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Instances report naming René Collier and Paul Feely described remarkable attempts through the plaintiffs to document the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded via ocean in storm to photograph the website, In accordance with sworn evidence referenced inside the Irish Instances. In one account, Rene Collier waded through midsection-significant drinking water through a storm to photograph the location Irish Periods, a picture which has considering that develop into emblematic with the depth with the dispute. These actions weren't basically symbolic; they have been meant to Collect visual evidence from the wall’s place relative to tidal strains and guarded land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the positioning from the sea Irish Instances reported, describing how The 2 Adult men entered the water all through severe climatic conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading by means of storm h2o to photograph the positioning turned One of the more hanging descriptions to emerge from court reporting. The Irish Occasions post about accountant Paul Feely famous that these kinds of actions ended up cited to reveal the plaintiffs’ belief which the wall extended into a region affected by tidal motion, strengthening their argument the SAC was being encroached on.
The functions at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 were included in detail by the national press. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Situations 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Situations January 27 2026 turned commonly searched phrases as viewers sought to be familiar with the qualifications and implications of the case. On that date, the High Court heard more submissions on no matter whether interim orders must be granted to halt design pending a full Listening to. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a critical moment in the legal timeline.
On the core in the dispute can be a disagreement in excess of boundaries, arranging compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely keep that the wall, as built, goes beyond what was approved and intrudes into shielded land. They argue that this is simply not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by career, has become described as meticulous in his assessment of arranging documents, maps, and conditions hooked up for the authorization.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have both equally stressed that their motion is inspired by issue for environmental defense and adherence to preparing regulation. They reject claims that the situation is about preserving a private perspective, insisting as a substitute that it is about guaranteeing that improvement at Sutton Strand respects lawful and ecological restrictions. In affidavits, they've described their lengthy-standing link to the area and their recognition of its environmental sensitivity.
On the other aspect, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed by themselves as a couple basically trying to make a family residence in accordance with the law. They deny the wall encroaches over a Special Location of Conservation and say that each one is effective have already been completed dependant on Expert suggestions and permitted designs. Their lawyers have argued that the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and that the dramatic actions of René Collier and Paul Feely, such as getting into the sea in the course of a storm, tend not to change the underlying information.
The case has also raised broader questions on how planning disputes are fixed in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court docket dispute around design of wall at coastal web page happens to be a shorthand description for just a problem that numerous observers see as significantly popular. As sea degrees rise and coastal erosion intensifies, the precise delineation between non-public land, community foreshore, and protected habitats has become additional contentious.
The Irish Moments report about René Collier mentioned which the businessman experienced previously been linked to regional advocacy on organizing and environmental problems, nevertheless not at this scale. In the meantime, the Irish Occasions article about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how persons from really various Qualified backgrounds can find by themselves aligned in this sort of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some experiences spell their names, are becoming synonymous Using the Sutton Strand scenario.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the site with the sea Irish Occasions coverage emphasised, underlining The weird lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded via waistline-high drinking water during a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Situations and René Collier waded via waistline-superior Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 water in the course of a storm to photograph the internet site Irish Times are phrases that appeared continuously in protection, reflecting both equally the Actual physical reality in the coastline plus the symbolic mother nature from the act. For supporters in the plaintiffs, these actions shown motivation; for critics, they illustrated whatever they see being an too much approach.
Because the High Court proceedings keep on, the end result continues to be unsure. The court docket will have to identify whether the wall as built complies with preparing permission and no matter if any encroachment right into a Exclusive Place of Conservation has transpired. The authorized arguments are intricate, involving interpretation of maps, tidal knowledge, and arranging problems. Nevertheless the human factor stays central: neighbours who should live together with one another prolonged after the lawful expenditures are paid.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing more than design performs at the website on Dublin Highway, Sutton, although the implications of the case increase outside of that deal with. For planners, builders, and inhabitants alike, the dispute serves as being a reminder of the necessity of clarity in arranging permissions and sensitivity in coastal improvement. Additionally, it underscores how quickly an area disagreement can escalate when basic issues for instance environmental protection and residence rights are perceived to get at stake.
Meanwhile, Sutton Strand remains a spot of purely natural attractiveness and contested boundaries. The wall for the centre in the dispute stands partly constructed, a Bodily manifestation of unresolved authorized thoughts. Whether it's going to in the long run be altered, removed, or finished as planned will depend upon the courtroom’s results. Right until then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variants will most likely proceed to seem in headlines, connected indelibly to Among the most intently viewed setting up disputes in north Dublin recently.